Web 2.0

The use of developing Web 2.0 tools encourages communication and collaboration between researchers, and has the potential to improve data sharing, and change how we think about peer-review and scholarly communication.

Although there has not been widespread adoption of web 2.0 tools, they do have potential for the future. The growth of tools such as Mendeley (Reference Management and Sharing Software) and recent experiments with open peer-review (e.g. Shakespeare Quarterly) demonstrate that web 2.0 does have the potential to play a larger role in the future, in relation to collaboration, research networking, sharing of ideas and data, peer-review, and communication, etc.

Research Information Network. (2010). If you build it, will they come? How researchers perceive and use web 2.0. http://www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/communicating-and-disseminating-research/use-and-relevance-web-20-researchers

Priem, J. & Hemminger, B. M. (2010). Scientometrics 2.0: Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First Monday, 15(7). http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2874/2570

Adie, E. (2009, 11 February).Commenting on scientific articles (PLoS edition). Nascent: Nature’s blog on web technology and science. http://blogs.nature.com/wp/nascent/2009/02/commenting_on_scientific_artic.html

MediaCommons Press. (2010). Shakespeare Quarterly: Open review: “Shakespeare and New Media”. MediaCommons Press – Open scholarship in open formats. http://mediacommons.futureofthebook.org/mcpress/ShakespeareQuarterly_NewMedia/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: