January 31, 2011 Leave a comment
It proved to be a successful event this past Thursday as Research Managers and Senior Library and Information Services Managers came together for a full day of presentations and discussion. The conference, organised by the CRC (specifically us working on the JISC funded RCS project), ARMA, RLUK and SCONUL focused on the growing need for integration between research support and information services.
The morning started off with introductions from Bill Hubbard (CRC), David Prosser (RLUK) and Ian Carter (ARMA), who set the appropriate tone for the day.
Susan Ashworth (University of Glasgow), Jill Golightly (Newcastle University), and Jackie Proven (University of St Andrews) then each discussed the current research managment situations at their universities. From all three it seemed clear that these systems need to:
- Provide only one place for researchers to input (and include integration with other systems),
- Have the ability to mass import and check data,
- Include ongoing advocacy to research staff,
- Meet the needs of the different players / stakeholders (have it work for REF, and OA, etc.)
Stephen Pinfield (University of Nottingham) then gave us an introduction to the work being done at Nottingham with their OA Publishing Fund, put in place to meet the need set by Funders’ mandates. Stephen went on to describe the cost of OA publishing (Gold road) at the University of Nottingham, pointing to the Houghton Report – and commenting that it is probably the most important report for those working in this area. Stephen also described how OA publishing is generally cheaper for the University of Nottingham using this modelling.
Robert Kiley (Wellcome Trust) and Gerry Lawson (NERC) each gave us a funders’ perspective. They described some of things funders need, one thing in particular that was discussed was the need for proper grant acknowledgement and attribution, with grant number, in a standard form.
We finished off the day with small groups and then a panel discussion. There were some interesting ideas that arose, and will hopefully be taken forward:
- Using the REF as a potential driver for OA content
- Extending the grant period so that funds can be used for OA publishing
- Standardisation of terms within these systems – including standardisation of grant acknowledgement
- Further sharing of good practice
Many key players were present and it was good to get them all in the same room and let them hear each other’s thoughts and concerns.
The full programme and
some of the slides are available here.
We may try and repeat the event or do something similar in the future so please do let us know if you are interested.